1857.
third.-The brand new last wedding away from Legal “Top and you can Point” An excellent.O.F. got well-known by the a food in the Sibling. Franklin’s, Hallway Quay. Mr. C. B. Dashwood occupied this new chair, also it was stated that this new Court upcoming contained ninety members.
The month of january
Messrs. Charles J. Palmer, B. Fenn, Rev. H. Squire, Dumbleton, R. Roentgen. B. Norman, Burton, and you will J. Bayly was actually select the fresh new members of the general public Library Panel.
p. 207 The body away from good whale, that was drawn from the Winterton, was being displayed toward Chapel Plain.
The Rev. W. D. Go, the brand new minister regarding St. Mary’s, Southtown, got, before you leave Southsea, already been offered a handbag out-of ?61.
twenty-first.-The fresh new “Sisters” had been when you look at the accident that have among the stone piers regarding the fresh Link, that it got considerably broken.
Feb. fourth.-A keen Anti-Tax fulfilling ended up being held in the City Hall. This new Mayor presided, as well as the adopting the participated in the proceedings:-Messrs. George Danby-Palmer, Bradbeer, Garson Blake, W. Livingston, S. B. Cory, Roentgen. Hammond, J. Clowes, J. H. Harrison, J. Rivett and J. Fiddes. Mr. S. Bradbeer appeared as if new mover within this amount.
Feb. 21st.-A “Poor’s Rate” conference was stored on Masonic Hallway. Mr. W. Livingston presided, and you will an answer protesting resistant to the 1s. 6d. every quarter price are adopted. Messrs J. Rivett, Joseph Neave, Royal, Roentgen. Bailey, Nichols, and you will F. Starling spoke about them, while the run of one’s Guardians try defended by Mr. J. H. Harrison, one of several Panel.
Feb. 25th.-A situation and this delighted significant attention, had been heard in the County Court, Tolhouse-hall, through to the Courtroom (T. J. Birch, Esq.) The fresh plaintiff is Mr. John Cobb, fabric supplier, for who Mr. C. H. Chamberlin seemed; the latest defendants was basically Messrs. W. Letter. Burroughs and you will G. D. Palmer, have been illustrated by Mr. J. L. Cufaude. The fresh plaintiff reported that he had been an applicant toward work environment out of Councillor with the age such as for instance at solicitation off Messrs. W. N. Burroughs and you may G. D. Palmer. At the time he became an applicant he decidedly told all of them that he won’t shell out out-of their own pocket even more than ?10 with the expenses of election, and it also try knew the Liberal people, to which he belonged, would signup the others. The night up until the election he gotten a quotation from what the expense was indeed apt to be, and in results of he at the same time watched both Mr. Burroughs and Mr. Grams. D. Palmer. You to definitely imagine, the guy felt, amounted in order to on ?forty-five, given that subscriptions completely amounted to help you but ?42. Shortly after particular dialogue it provided to keep your simple of your own amount of the expenses which could go beyond the sum of subscribed, and he and Mr. Burroughs then went p. 208 into Panel-place of your own Northern-ward, in which Mr. Burroughs told you they had produced preparations for their friend John Cobb effective the market-ward. The costs of your own election, which he (the plaintiff) lost, amounted altogether in order to ?58 1s. 7d. The balance, ergo, which he now reported regarding defendants try ?sixteen 1s. 7d.-Brand new plaintiff, during the mix-examination of the Mr. Cufaude, accepted you to definitely ?39 of your own entire matter are for – -.-Mr. Cufaude debated if, since the plaintiff mentioned, the defendants had provided your https://getbride.org/no/blog/svensk-datingside/ a hope to the extra costs, the new make sure must can be found in writing. And you may, just in case the evidence are real, and this, although not, the guy debated, it absolutely was hopeless toward plaintiff to recover, inasmuch as he himself had welcome one a corner of the full expenditures are for – -, which had been an illegal operate.-Mr. Chamberlin argued your plaintiff, once researching brand new guarantee regarding defendants, acted just abreast of the fresh faith of the promise, and that hence, as they got registered upon an engagement to spend the cash, these people were liable. The money, also, was not spent because of the plaintiff, however, by the panel appointed in order to conduct the brand new election, and you can up until the election try over, the fresh new plaintiff was not aware that any of the money had already been spent from inside the – -.-His Honour told you it actually was clear this new verify need started in writing. He was away from viewpoint, also, your plaintiff wasn’t destined to pay the illegal charge, and therefore he could perhaps not provide their action for the money that he stated.-The newest plaintiff is actually, consequently, non-recommended.
